tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-624745733838877352.post5543724409046730440..comments2023-06-23T10:12:38.968-04:00Comments on Glomarization, Esq.: Poking around a white supremacist constitution so you don't have toGlomarizationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05624293157927622360noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-624745733838877352.post-84706080183520270222015-03-01T12:21:03.167-05:002015-03-01T12:21:03.167-05:00I think you're probably right. Not that the qu...I think you're probably right. Not that the question has been keeping me up nights or anything, but I've thought and thought and can't come up with any reasonable policy behind the rule.Glomarizationhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05624293157927622360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-624745733838877352.post-36690264166551650362015-02-27T16:15:21.703-05:002015-02-27T16:15:21.703-05:00I would guess that the no lawyering for pay rule h...I would guess that the no lawyering for pay rule has its origin in one of the drafter's own experiences with a lawyer. Maybe that lawyer overcharged him. Or maybe the lawyer just charged him while telling him that the actual constitution is not the same as the white supremacist document of his dreams.upyernozhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13468075957480441353noreply@blogger.com